Argumentative Bullshit
نویسندگان
چکیده
Harry Frankfurt characterised bullshit as assertions that are made without a concern for truth. Assertions, however, not the only type of speech act can be bullshit. Here, I propose concept argumentative and show how acts account generalised to arguments. Argumentative bullshit, on this account, would production an argument supporting relation between reasons claim.
منابع مشابه
Raising the Tone: Definition, Bullshit, and the Definition of Bullshit
I always love that kind of argument. The contrary of a thing isn’t the contrary; oh, dear me, no! It’s the thing itself, but as it truly is. Ask any die-hard what conservatism is; he’ll tell you that it’s true socialism. And the brewers’ trade papers: they’re full of articles about the beauty of true temperance. Ordinary temperance is just gross refusal to drink; but true temperance, true tempe...
متن کاملGenerating Argumentative Judgment Determiners
This paper presents a procedure to generate judgment determiners, e.g., many, few. Although such determiners carry very little objective information , they are extensively used in everyday language. The paper presents a precise characterization of a class of such determiners using three semantic tests. A conceptual representation for sets is then derived from this characterization which can ser...
متن کاملHaskell Gets Argumentative
Argumentation theory is an interdisciplinary field studying how conclusions can be reached through logical reasoning. The notion of argument is completely general, including for example legal arguments, scientific arguments, and political arguments. Computational argumentation theory is studied in the context of artificial intelligence, and a number of computational argumentation frameworks hav...
متن کاملArgumentative alternating offers
This paper presents an argumentative version of the well known alternating offers negotiation protocol. The negotiation mechanism is based on an abstract preference based argumentation framework where both epistemic and practical arguments are taken into consideration in order to decide about different strategic issues. Such issues are the offer that is proposed at each round, acceptance or ref...
متن کاملPlanning Argumentative Texts
This paper presents PROVERB a text planner for argumentative texts. PROVERB ś main feature is that it combines global hierarchical planning and unplanned organization of text with respect to local derivation relations in a complementary way. The former splits the task of presenting a particular proof into subtasks of presenting subproofs. The latter simulates how the next intermediate conclusio...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Informal Logic
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['2293-734X', '0824-2577']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v41i3.6838